Final Reflections: What Have We Learned? (and Still Need to Know)
Wrapping up this journey of reflections on adult learning through social media is both a celebration of what we have discovered and an invitation to keep exploring. Over the past several weeks, each blog post has highlighted a key aspect of this dynamic phenomenon, blending personal experience, theory, and practical observation to explore how digital media reshapes how adults learn.
In one of my posts, I shared my experience learning
Microsoft Office hacks through Instagram Reels, a clear example of informal
learning that did not occur in a formal course but in spontaneous moments of
scrolling. This demonstrated how knowledge can flow accessibly and
continuously, like a river, and how learning can thrive outside traditional
classrooms (Jenkins, Ito, & Boyd, 2016).
Another reflection examined how race, gender, and
representation appear, or are silenced, in social learning spaces. Asking who
gets to speak and who is heard pushes us to recognize that these platforms are
not neutral. We must reconsider the digital gatekeeping mechanisms embedded in
them (Noble, 2018).
I also wrote about the impact of the pandemic, which
magnified digital access inequalities, especially for low-income adults, rural
learners, and older populations. The so-called “digital divide” goes beyond
connectivity; it includes digital literacy and the sense of belonging in online
environments (Horrigan, 2016). There is still a long way to go to ensure
equitable access to and participation in these learning communities.
Motivation theory was another key theme in my posts.
Using Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) and Expectancy-Value
Theory (Wigfield & Eccles, 2000), we see that adults engage with social
media for learning because they find value, autonomy, and a sense of competence.
Emerging technologies like AI tutors and virtual reality point to a future of
even more personalized and immersive learning experiences.
Through my interactions with classmates like Paris,
Adam, Aastha, John, India, and Felipe, I have seen how collaborative reflection
and experience-sharing deepen our understanding. We discussed digital detox,
digital citizenship, performance assessment in collaborative spaces, and the
unique challenges international students face online. These exchanges show that
learning happens not just in content, but in the connections we create.
As we close this cycle, I leave a few critical
questions for continued thought:
- How
can we ensure online learning communities are inclusive, culturally
responsive, and critical?
- How
do we balance the informality of social media with evidence-based
educational practices?
- How
can we prevent technological innovation from deepening existing
inequalities rather than alleviating them?
We do not have all the answers yet. However, one thing
is sure: learning through social media is a living, fluid, and profoundly human
practice, and it is only just beginning.
See you around!
References
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic
motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Horrigan, J. B. (2016). Digital Readiness Gaps.
Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/09/20/digital-readiness-gaps/
Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & boyd, d. (2016). Participatory
culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and
politics. Polity Press.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How
search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000).
Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Comments
Post a Comment